Which of the following best describes the protection against the media in a super-injunction?

Which of the following best describes the protection against the media in a super-injunction?

• A. A Complete ban on media coverage of any subject
• B. B The media can publish about the injunction as long as details are avoided
• C. C No information can be disclosed even about the injunction itself
• D. D The media must reveal their sources when working with injunctions

Answer: (C)

The best description of the protection against the media in a super-injunction is that no information can be disclosed even about the injunction itself. A super-injunction is a legal order that not only prohibits the media from publishing information about specific subject matter but also prevents the disclosure of the existence of the injunction itself. This level of restriction is used in particularly sensitive cases, often where revealing the injunction could lead to undue harm to an individual's privacy or reputation. A super-injunction effectively creates a situation where the media is completely barred from discussing both the details and the mere fact of the injunction, ensuring that the protected individual's interests are safeguarded to the maximum extent legally possible. This contrasts with the more typical injunction, which might allow for some commentary on the injunction itself while forbidding coverage of the underlying subject matter. The strict nature of a super-injunction highlights the significant weight placed on privacy in certain legal contexts.

The best description of the protection against the media in a super-injunction is that no information can be disclosed even about the injunction itself. A super-injunction is a legal order that not only prohibits the media from publishing information about specific subject matter but also prevents the disclosure of the existence of the injunction itself. This level of restriction is used in particularly sensitive cases, often where revealing the injunction could lead to undue harm to an individual's privacy or reputation.

A super-injunction effectively creates a situation where the media is completely barred from discussing both the details and the mere fact of the injunction, ensuring that the protected individual's interests are safeguarded to the maximum extent legally possible. This contrasts with the more typical injunction, which might allow for some commentary on the injunction itself while forbidding coverage of the underlying subject matter. The strict nature of a super-injunction highlights the significant weight placed on privacy in certain legal contexts.