What action could a broadcaster take to fulfill the requirements of the innocent dissemination defense?

What action could a broadcaster take to fulfill the requirements of the innocent dissemination defense?

• A. Continue the interview regardless of the comments made.
• B. Use licensed material only.
• C. Cut off the interviewee if they make a defamatory comment.
• D. Ensure no audience interaction during the broadcast.

Answer: (C)

The option to cut off the interviewee if they make a defamatory comment aligns with the requirements of the innocent dissemination defense in media law. This defense protects publishers and broadcasters from liability for defamatory statements made by third parties, provided that they did not know, and had no reason to suspect, that the comments were defamatory. By taking immediate action—such as interrupting or cutting off an interviewee who makes a defamatory statement—a broadcaster demonstrates due diligence and a proactive approach in controlling the content of the broadcast. This can help to establish that they did not facilitate or endorse the defamatory comment, which is crucial for claiming innocent dissemination if faced with legal claims. This approach directly addresses the broadcaster's responsibility to monitor and respond to potentially harmful content during live interviews. It reflects an understanding that not acting on defamatory comments could expose the broadcaster to legal consequences. Thus, cutting off the interviewee is a clear action that supports the defense of innocent dissemination.

The option to cut off the interviewee if they make a defamatory comment aligns with the requirements of the innocent dissemination defense in media law. This defense protects publishers and broadcasters from liability for defamatory statements made by third parties, provided that they did not know, and had no reason to suspect, that the comments were defamatory.

By taking immediate action—such as interrupting or cutting off an interviewee who makes a defamatory statement—a broadcaster demonstrates due diligence and a proactive approach in controlling the content of the broadcast. This can help to establish that they did not facilitate or endorse the defamatory comment, which is crucial for claiming innocent dissemination if faced with legal claims.

This approach directly addresses the broadcaster's responsibility to monitor and respond to potentially harmful content during live interviews. It reflects an understanding that not acting on defamatory comments could expose the broadcaster to legal consequences. Thus, cutting off the interviewee is a clear action that supports the defense of innocent dissemination.